
-
September 24, 2026
Migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14: MCA During V3 Transition
Introduction
The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 became an important compliance matter during the transition of company forms from MCA21 Version 2 to Version 3 in early 2023. During the stabilization of newly launched V3 forms, stakeholders faced difficulties in completing certain filings connected with time-bound corporate activities.
To address these concerns, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs provided a temporary physical filing mechanism for specified company forms from 22 February 2023 to 31 March 2023. The relaxation covered GNL-2 and MGT-14 for specified purposes, along with PAS-3, SH-8, SH-9 and SH-11.
For the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14, the scope was specific. GNL-2 covered prospectus-related documents and private placement, while MGT-14 covered resolutions relating to prospectus-related documents and private placement. The temporary arrangement helped companies manage these filings while the V3 system was being stabilized.
Key Points
- Physical filing of six specified forms was permitted from 22 February 2023 to 31 March 2023.
- GNL-2 relief applied to prospectus-related documents and private placement.
- MGT-14 relief applied to resolutions relating to prospectus-related documents and private placement.
- Companies using physical filing had to undertake subsequent electronic filing on MCA21.
- The applicable normal filing fee remained payable, while additional fee relief was governed by the separate MCA clarification.
Why Did the V3 Transition Affect GNL-2 and MGT-14?
MCA launched 45 forms on Version 3 with effect from 23 January 2023. During the stabilization of these forms, stakeholders represented that difficulties in filing certain forms could interfere with activities that had to be completed within prescribed timelines.
The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 was particularly relevant because the specified uses of these forms were linked with prospectus and private placement transactions. A filing difficulty at this stage could affect the procedural sequence of the underlying corporate activity.
MCA therefore provided a temporary route through which companies could make the specified filings physically with the concerned Registrar. The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 was supported through this transitional facility without removing the requirement to eventually complete electronic filing.
Stakeholders can refer to the official MCA circulars repository for circulars and regulatory updates issued by the Ministry.
What Changed for Form GNL-2?
For the purpose of this relaxation, Form GNL-2 was specifically identified for filing prospectus-related documents and private placement. A company intending to make such a filing during the permitted period could submit the form physically to the concerned Registrar.
Under the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14, the physical GNL-2 had to be duly signed by the persons concerned according to the requirements applicable to the form. A copy of the form was also required to be provided in electronic media.
It is important to understand the limitation of the relief. The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 did not mean that every transaction normally involving GNL-2 became eligible for physical filing. The February 2023 clarification specifically referred to prospectus-related documents and private placement for GNL-2.
What Changed for Form MGT-14?
MGT-14 was covered for filing resolutions relating to prospectus-related documents and private placement. This limitation is important because MGT-14 is otherwise used for filing various resolutions and agreements with the Registrar.
For the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14, an eligible MGT-14 filing could be submitted physically to the concerned Registrar between 22 February 2023 and 31 March 2023. The form had to be duly signed and accompanied by a copy in electronic media.
The relaxation should therefore not be interpreted as permission to physically file every MGT-14 falling due during the period. The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 relief applied only to the purposes expressly specified by MCA.
For a broader understanding of statutory company forms, readers can refer to our list of MCA forms for company filings, which includes both MGT-14 and GNL-2 among important company filing forms.
Which Other Forms Were Covered?
The February 2023 relaxation was not restricted to the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14. MCA covered six forms in total.
- GNL-2: Prospectus-related documents and private placement
- MGT-14: Resolutions relating to prospectus-related documents and private placement
- PAS-3: Allotment of shares
- SH-8: Letter of offer for buy-back of own shares or other securities
- SH-9: Declaration of solvency
- SH-11: Return in respect of buy-back of securities
The forms covered indicate that MCA’s temporary measure was directed at specified corporate transactions that could be affected by the stabilization of the V3 filing system.
How Could Companies File During the Transition?
The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 created a temporary alternative filing procedure for eligible companies.
First, the relevant form had to be prepared and duly signed by the persons concerned according to the requirements of that form. A copy also had to be prepared in electronic media. The company could then submit the physical form and electronic copy to the concerned Registrar.
The physical filing facility applied to specified forms intended to be filed from 22 February 2023 to 31 March 2023. Once the documents were submitted, the company could take an acknowledgement from the Registrar in the format provided in the Annexure.
However, the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 did not end with physical submission. The company was required to provide an undertaking confirming that it would also file the relevant form electronically on the MCA21 portal along with the applicable fee.
Businesses requiring assistance with statutory filings can explore MCA Filing Services for support with MCA and ROC compliance requirements.
Was the Filing Fee Waived?
The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 did not result in a complete waiver of the normal filing fee.
The specified form could be submitted physically to the concerned Registrar without payment of fee at the time of physical filing. However, the company had to undertake that it would subsequently file the relevant form electronically and pay the fee applicable under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.
There was also a separate additional fee relaxation. General Circular No. 05/2023 specifically referred to General Circular No. 04/2023 dated 21 February 2023 and stated that no additional fees would be levied as referred to in that circular.
The distinction matters. The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 allowed physical submission without an upfront filing fee, but it did not permanently eliminate the prescribed normal fee payable when the electronic form was subsequently filed.
The Government’s official PIB release also explained the additional-time and additional-fee relief connected with the V3 migration and the 45 forms launched on 23 January 2023.
Why Was an Undertaking Required?
The undertaking was an essential condition because physical submission was only a transitional filing mechanism.
Under the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14, a company making use of the temporary physical facility had to confirm that it would subsequently file the relevant form electronically on MCA21 along with the prescribed fee.
This requirement maintained the electronic filing obligation while giving companies an alternative during the stabilization period. In practical terms, the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 involved two stages for eligible filings: physical submission during the permitted period and subsequent electronic filing.
The undertaking also made it clear that obtaining an acknowledgement from the ROC did not eliminate the company’s responsibility to complete the electronic filing.
What Was the Importance of the ROC Acknowledgement?
The Annexure to the clarification provided a specific acknowledgement format for the Registrar of Companies.
For the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14, the acknowledgement recorded the receipt of the relevant physical form along with the undertaking. The format provided fields for details such as the form concerned, event date, filing date during the permitted period and brief details of the filing.
This acknowledgement was important because it created documentary evidence that the company had physically submitted the specified form during the transition period.
The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 therefore did not rely only on informal submission of documents. MCA expressly contemplated an acknowledgement mechanism through the Registrar for the forms submitted under the temporary arrangement.
Why Was the Relief Important for Time-Bound Transactions?
The forms covered by the relaxation were associated with corporate actions where procedural timelines could matter.
GNL-2 and MGT-14 were covered for specified prospectus and private placement matters. PAS-3 related to allotment of shares, while SH-8, SH-9 and SH-11 related to different stages of a buy-back process.
The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 could therefore affect more than an individual ROC form. Difficulties in completing a required filing could interfere with other steps connected with the corporate transaction.
The temporary physical filing facility created a bridge between the company’s compliance responsibility and the technical stabilization of MCA21 V3. The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 could thus be handled without making eligible companies entirely dependent on completion of the portal stabilization process before submitting the specified documents.
Key Conditions Companies Had to Follow
- Companies making use of the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 relief had to keep the following conditions in mind:
- The relevant filing had to fall within the period from 22 February 2023 to 31 March 2023.
- GNL-2 was covered for prospectus-related documents and private placement.
- MGT-14 was covered for resolutions relating to prospectus-related documents and private placement.
- The relevant form had to be duly signed by the persons concerned.
- A copy of the form had to be provided in electronic media.
- Physical filing had to be made with the concerned Registrar.
- The company had to provide an undertaking for subsequent electronic filing.
- The applicable normal filing fee remained payable at the electronic filing stage.
- The company could obtain acknowledgement of the physical submission from the Registrar.
These conditions confirm that the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 involved a limited procedural relaxation. It did not suspend the underlying compliance obligation or convert physical filing into a permanent substitute for MCA21 electronic filing.
Get Professional Support for MCA Form Filings
Managing MCA filings during regulatory or portal changes can be confusing, especially when forms, filing modes, timelines, and supporting documents are involved. Ebizfiling assists businesses with MCA and ROC compliance by helping them understand the applicable filing requirements, prepare the necessary documents, and complete the required filings accurately.
If your company needs support with MCA filings, private placement compliance, resolutions, or other corporate filings, you can connect with Ebizfiling for professional assistance.
Get expert support for your MCA compliance with Ebizfiling today.
Conclusion
The migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 created practical compliance difficulties during the stabilization of MCA21 Version 3 in early 2023. To address these concerns, MCA allowed specified GNL-2, MGT-14, PAS-3, SH-8, SH-9 and SH-11 filings to be submitted physically to the concerned Registrar from 22 February 2023 to 31 March 2023.
The scope of the relief was clearly defined. For GNL-2, it covered prospectus-related documents and private placement. For MGT-14, it covered resolutions relating to these matters. Companies were also required to submit signed forms with copies in electronic media and provide an undertaking for subsequent electronic filing.
Most importantly, the migration of Forms GNL-2 and MGT-14 did not eliminate the normal filing fee or the electronic filing requirement. The temporary physical filing facility gave companies a practical compliance route during V3 stabilization while preserving their responsibility to complete the required electronic filings afterward.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Did MCA extend the statutory due date for filing MGT-14 during the V3 migration?
No. MCA did not amend the statutory due date for MGT-14. The relaxation only provided a temporary physical filing route during MCA21 V3 stabilization. The underlying filing obligation under Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013 remained unchanged.
2. Which date was relevant for determining the MGT-14 filing requirement?
The relevant date remained the original corporate event date, such as the date of passing the resolution or entering into the agreement. Physical submission to the ROC did not replace or alter the underlying event date for compliance purposes.
3. Can GNL-2 replace MGT-14 or PAS-3 during MCA V3 migration?
No. Form GNL-2 could not replace MGT-14 or PAS-3 merely because of the MCA21 V3 migration. Each form retained its separate purpose, legal requirement, filing scope, and supporting documentation under the applicable provisions of company law.
4. Did the V3 migration change when MGT-14 was legally applicable?
No. The MCA21 V3 migration did not change the legal applicability of MGT-14. Companies still had to determine whether a resolution or agreement required filing under Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013 and applicable rules.
5. Was physical filing eligibility based on the transaction date or filing period?
The relaxation applied to specified forms intended to be filed between 22 February 2023 and 31 March 2023. The underlying transaction or event date still had to be correctly disclosed because the relief did not alter statutory event dates.
6. Could companies submit only an electronic copy instead of the signed physical form?
No. The temporary procedure required the relevant form to be duly signed and submitted physically to the concerned Registrar along with a copy in electronic media. An electronic copy alone did not satisfy the prescribed physical filing arrangement.
7. Was the normal MCA filing fee permanently waived for GNL-2 and MGT-14?
No. The specified physical filing could be submitted without fee at that stage, but companies still had to subsequently file the form electronically on MCA21 and pay the applicable fee under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.
8. Was the ROC acknowledgement equal to an MCA Service Request Number?
No. The ROC acknowledgement only confirmed receipt of the physical filing during the permitted transition period. It was not equivalent to an MCA Service Request Number and did not replace the company’s obligation to complete the subsequent electronic filing.
9. Can Ebizfiling help determine whether MGT-14 is required for a company resolution?
Yes. Ebizfiling can assist businesses in reviewing the nature of a resolution, identifying whether MGT-14 or another MCA form is applicable, preparing supporting documents, and completing the relevant ROC filing requirements according to the applicable compliance provisions.
10. Can Ebizfiling assist with GNL-2, MGT-14 and related ROC filings?
Yes. Ebizfiling provides support for MCA and ROC compliance, including document preparation, form filing, resolution-related requirements, and other company law filings. Businesses can seek professional assistance to complete applicable filings accurately and maintain proper compliance records.
Online Register Your LLP Now
Register your Limited Liability Partnership at Ebizfiling.
About Ebizfiling -

Reviews
Akshay Shah
17 Jun 2017I would give them 4 stars for their efficiency and pricing.
Akshay shinde
23 Apr 2019Excellent service…
Hetal Verma
27 Jan 2018Great work done by the Ebizfiling team. Good luck for the future.
July 9, 2026 By Steffy A
AML obligations for Practicing CS under FIU-IND Framework Introduction AML obligations for Practicing CS are becoming increasingly important in today’s evolving regulatory environment, where the role of Practicing Company Secretaries has expanded beyond traditional compliance functions into areas involving corporate […]
June 26, 2026 By Steffy A
Why Online Legal Services Are Growing in India? Introduction The legal industry is evolving rapidly as technology reshapes how legal assistance is delivered. In India, online legal services are growing because they address historical challenges such as court backlogs, complex […]
June 26, 2026 By Steffy A
Why More Businesses Are Choosing Outsourcing Legal Work? Introduction Businesses are increasingly turning to outsourcing legal work to manage compliance, contracts, and regulatory responsibilities more efficiently. Through Legal Process Outsourcing, companies can reduce operational costs while gaining access to experienced […]