We recently handled a real case where founders were operating an Indian LLP alongside their own US LLC and faced multiple questions related to GST, foreign payments, invoicing, payroll, and overall regulatory compliance.
The business structure itself was common and legally valid. However, confusion began once foreign payments started coming in and Indian compliance requirements had to be followed. This blog summarises the key questions raised in that case and explains the practical solutions that were applied.
If you are running a similar setup and have doubts about how compliance works between an Indian LLP and a US LLC, this guide will help you understand what needs to be done.
A common question is whether an Indian LLP and a US LLC owned by the same founder are treated as related entities.
In this case:
Since there is no holding or subsidiary relationship, the structure is treated as a service provider model, which is important for GST and transfer pricing evaluation.
In this case, the service delivery is split clearly between the two entities based on their roles.
Since the services are performed in India and delivered to an overseas entity, the arrangement is treated as an export of services. This classification becomes important later for GST treatment and foreign remittance documentation.
Another frequent question is how service delivery is viewed in such structures.
Here, the model is simple:
Because the services are provided from India to a foreign entity, they are treated as export of services under Indian GST laws.
One of the most common questions in such setups is whether FIRC or FIRA is mandatory when the Indian LLP receives foreign payments for services.
In this case, FIRC or FIRA is generally required as proof of export of services, especially for treating the supply as zero-rated under GST. Since earlier payments were received through Wise and the USD to INR conversion was done by Wise and not by the Indian bank, FIRC was not issued for those transactions.
How this was handled and what should be done:
These documents are commonly accepted in practice when FIRC is not available.
As for BRC, it is required for export of services. Banks usually generate BRC once the foreign remittance is realized. If funds are routed through platforms like Wise and BRC is not auto-generated, FIRC along with bank credit advice generally works as an alternative.
In this setup, the services are performed by the Indian LLP and delivered to an overseas entity. Such services are treated as export of services under GST and qualify as zero-rated supply, which means GST is not charged on the invoice.
However, to treat the supply as zero-rated, the Indian LLP is required to file a Letter of Undertaking (LUT). The LUT allows the LLP to export services without charging GST and report the transactions correctly in GST returns. Without a valid LUT, the zero-rated treatment may not be available.
What needs to be done:
The Indian LLP should ensure that the LUT is filed before continuing export of services. Once the LUT is in place, export invoices can be raised without GST and reported accordingly in GST returns.
|
Aspect |
What Applies in This Case |
|
Billing frequency |
Invoices should be raised on a monthly basis |
|
Who raises the invoice |
Indian LLP raises the invoice to the US LLC |
|
What is billed |
Monthly operational expenses of the LLP |
|
Markup |
An additional markup of around 17 percent |
|
Purpose of markup |
To maintain a commercially reasonable, arm’s length billing |
|
Payment basis |
Payments should be made strictly against the raised invoices |
This billing structure ensures consistency, transparency, and alignment with compliance requirements when services are provided by an Indian LLP to its own US LLC.
The Indian LLP should raise an export invoice to the US LLC for the services provided.
Action point:
Continue issuing USD export invoices without GST using the SAC code that correctly matches the nature of services provided.
Transfer pricing audit or agreement is not required where there is no holding, subsidiary, or associate relationship and the overall revenue is below ₹15 lakh. Common ownership alone does not trigger transfer pricing compliance.
No RBI approval is required to operate a US LLC. ODI reporting is required only if Indian resident funds are invested in the US entity.
Action point:
No transfer pricing audit is needed. Ensure ODI reporting only if Indian funds are invested in the US LLC.
A common concern was whether TDS needs to be deducted on employee salaries.
Here, each employee earns less than ₹25,000 per month, which keeps their annual income below ₹12,00,000 under the new tax regime. Since the income does not cross the applicable threshold, TDS does not apply at this stage.
What to keep in mind:
There is no requirement to deduct or file TDS for these salaries right now. This should only be revisited if employee compensation increases beyond the threshold in the future.
Another question that often comes up is whether partners or directors can pay business expenses from their personal accounts.
Ideally, all business expenses should be paid directly from the LLP’s bank account. That keeps records clean and avoids confusion later. However, if a partner pays for a business expense personally, it is still acceptable as long as proper bills and supporting documents are maintained.
What needs to be done:
Such expenses should be recorded as reimbursements in the LLP’s books and paid back to the partner accordingly. Any amount paid by a partner for business purposes should be clearly supported and reflected correctly in the accounting records.
The amount that can be remitted from the US LLC to the Indian LLP depends entirely on the value of the invoice raised by the Indian LLP.
Only the invoiced amount can be legally transferred to the Indian LLP. If the intention is to remit the entire amount received by the US LLC, the Indian LLP must raise an invoice for that full amount. Doing so will increase the LLP’s total revenue, which will then be taxed at the applicable rate of 30 percent.
Straight answer:
You cannot freely transfer all funds unless they are backed by a valid invoice. Remittances must always match the invoice value raised by the Indian LLP.
For future transactions, the compliance and payment process should follow a clear and consistent flow.
Following this process ensures that payments, documentation, and GST reporting remain aligned and compliant going forward.
Yes, the same individual can own both an Indian LLP and a US LLC. Common ownership does not automatically create a holding–subsidiary relationship between the two entities.
No, GST is not charged if the services qualify as export of services. However, the Indian LLP must file a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) to treat the supply as zero-rated under GST.
FIRC or FIRA is generally required as proof of export of services. If payments are received through Wise and FIRC is not issued, supporting documents such as bank credit advice, Wise statements, and export invoices should be properly maintained.
No, the US LLC can remit only amounts supported by valid invoices raised by the Indian LLP. The transferred amount must strictly match the invoiced value.
No, a transfer pricing audit is not required if there is no holding, subsidiary, or associate relationship and the revenue remains below the applicable threshold. Common ownership alone does not trigger transfer pricing compliance.
Why Marketers Must Collaborate With Legal Experts for Startups? It Usually Starts With a Marketing Decision In most startups, legal…
How Digital Marketers Can Add Value with IP Awareness? To Start With, Most digital marketers focus on growth, reach, and…
Complete Guide to Ebizfiling Payment Options Introduction At Ebizfiling, we understand that clear payment options matter just as much as…
Why HR consultants should build partnerships with compliance firms? This question comes up sooner than most HR consultants expect Most…
Why marketers should know about trademark basics in 2026? Introduction Marketing in 2026 is no longer just about reach, clicks,…
Why HR managers must know about PF & ESIC compliance in 2026? This usually starts with a simple question It…
Leave a Comment